Research Article

Pre-Service Teachers Nature of Science Views After Engaging with COVID-19 as a Socioscientific Issue

Savannah R. Graham 1 * , Hayat Hokayem 1
More Detail
1 Andrews Institute of Mathematics & Science Education, College of Education, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, TX, USA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 2(2), December 2022, 29-34, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/12312
Published: 06 August 2022
OPEN ACCESS   764 Views   563 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This study investigates undergraduate pre-service understanding and views of nature of science (NOS) before and after engaging with a socioscientific issues-based unit based on a the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 unit consisted of lessons about viruses and bacteria, COVID-19, the spread of disease, and NOS. The data sources consisted of pre- and post-semi-structured interviews and pre- and post-questionnaires. After the unit in post-interviews, most students held transitional views of each NOS aspect (tentativeness, process, society, creativity). However, some students had informed views of tentativeness and process of science and naïve views of society and creativity in science. Pre-service teachers tended to rely on examples from the COVID-19 pandemic when explaining their NOS understandings, which resulted from teaching about NOS with socioscientific issues in a contextualized approach. We discuss the implications of these results for future pre-service teacher training with socioscientific issues.
Keywords: nature of science, pre-service teachers, socioscientific issues

CITATION (APA)

Graham, S. R., & Hokayem, H. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers Nature of Science Views After Engaging with COVID-19 as a Socioscientific Issue. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 2(2), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/12312

REFERENCES

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but… Journal of Science Teaching Education, 12(3), 215-233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016720417219
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2006). Over and over again: College students’ views of nature of science. In L. B. Flick, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 389-425). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2672-2_18
  3. Amirshokoohi, A. (2010). Elementary pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy and views towards science, technology, and society (STS) issues. Science Educator, 19(1), 56-63.
  4. Amirshokoohi, A. (2016). Impact of STS issue oriented instruction on pre-service teachers’ views and perceptions of science, technology, and society. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 359-387.
  5. Bell, R. L., Mulvey, B. K., & Maeng, J. L. (2016). Outcomes of nature of science instruction along a context continuum: Preservice secondary science teachers’ conceptions and instructional intentions. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1151960
  6. Bilican, K., Cakiroglu, J., & Oztekin, C. (2015). How contextualized learning settings enhance meaningful nature of science understanding. Science Education International, 27(4), 463-487.
  7. Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z. R., Letts, W. J., & Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 340-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<340::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-D
  8. Clough, M. P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science &Education, 15, 463-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7
  9. Cobern, W. W. (2001). The thinking about science survey instrument (TSSO): An instrument for the quantitative study of socio-cultural sources of support and resistance to science. Scientific Literacy and Cultural Studies Project. 37. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/science_slcsp/37
  10. Cook, K. L., & Buck, G. A. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ understanding of the nature of science through socio-scientific inquiry. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(1), 1-24.
  11. Duruk, U. (2020). Nature of science representations in scenarios created by prospective science teachers on socio-scientific issues. African Educational Research Journal, 8, 109-120.
  12. Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
  13. Espeja, A. G., & Lagarón, D. C. (2015). Socio-scientific issues (SSI) in initial training of primary teachers: Pre-service teachers’ conceptualization of SSI and appreciation of the value of teaching SSI. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 196, 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.015
  14. Graham, S. R., Tolar, A., & Hokayem, H. (2020). Teaching pre-service teachers about COVID-19 through distance learning. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(3), 29-37.
  15. Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Science literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
  16. Leden, L., Hansson, L., & Ideland, M. (2020). The mangle of school science practice: Teachers’ negotiations of two nature of science activities at different levels of contextualization. Science Education, 104, 2-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21553
  17. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
  18. Lui, S. Y., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17905.x
  19. Matkins, J., & Bell, R. (2007). Awakening the scientist inside: Global climate change and the nature of science in an elementary science methods course. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9033-4
  20. Mesci, G. (2020). Difficult topics in nature of science: An alternative explicit/reflective program for pre-service science teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1355-1374.
  21. Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., Merle-Johnson, D., Witzig, S. B., Izci, K., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). A framework for socio-scientific issues-based education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26-32.
  22. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/ science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729-780). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  23. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
  24. Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802681839
  25. Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Student conceptualization of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
  26. Sadler, T. D., Friedrichsen, P., Zangori, L., & Ke, L. (2020). Technology-supported professional development for collaborative design of COVID-19 instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 171-177.
  27. Scharmann, L. C., Smith, M. U., James, M. C., & Jensen, M. (2005). Explicit reflective nature of science instruction: Evolution, intelligent design, and umbrellaology. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16, 27-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-6990-y
  28. Seyhan, H. G., & Okur, M. (2021a). Examining the changes in pre-service science teacher’ views on science, technology and society: The impact of socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(3), 2923-2956.
  29. Seyhan, H. G., & Okur, M. (2021b). Investigation of the effects of science, technology and society (STS) education based on socioscientific issues on pre-service teachers’ science literacy levels. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alparslan University, 9(4), 1127-1139.
  30. Smithsonian Science Education Center. (2020). COVID-19! How do I protect myself and others? Smithsonian Science for Global Goals. https://ssec.si.edu/global-goals
  31. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. SAGE.
  32. Zeidler, D. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 697-726). Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  33. Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
  34. Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025