Review Article

Understanding the nature of science in biology education: A meta-analysis of students’ and teachers’ views in senior high schools

Maxwell Gyamfi 1 , David Asai Ayaaba 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Integrated Science Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), June 2026, 1-5, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/17753
Submitted: 28 November 2024, Published: 19 January 2026
OPEN ACCESS   48 Views   19 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis investigates the perspectives of senior high school biology students and teachers on the nature of science (NOS), aiming to identify common understandings, misconceptions, and instructional challenges. The study synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed articles, dissertations, and credible institutional reports published between 2000 and 2023. Using a systematic search across databases such as Google Scholar, ERIC, and JSTOR, and guided by clear inclusion criteria, the analysis incorporates both qualitative and quantitative data. Thematic synthesis and meta-analytic techniques were employed to explore trends, misconceptions, and the impact of teacher professional development (PD) on NOS instruction. Results indicate that while biology teachers tend to possess a more advanced understanding of NOS than students, significant gaps and misconceptions persist among both groups particularly regarding the tentative nature of scientific knowledge and the distinction between scientific laws and theories. Furthermore, the study finds that although PD can enhance teachers’ conceptual and pedagogical grasp of NOS, curriculum constraints often limit effective classroom implementation. The findings underscore the need for curriculum reform and targeted teacher training to enhance science literacy and foster accurate conceptions of NOS in secondary education.

CITATION (APA)

Gyamfi, M., & Ayaaba, D. A. (2026). Understanding the nature of science in biology education: A meta-analysis of students’ and teachers’ views in senior high schools. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/17753

REFERENCES

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044
  2. Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2014). Challenges faced by science teachers in the teaching of integrated science in Ghanaian junior high schools. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 59-80.
  3. Akerson, V. L., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902717283
  4. Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry: Results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20159
  5. Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
  6. Dogan, O. K. (2021). Methodological? Or dialectical?: Reflections of scientific inquiry in biology textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 1563-1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7
  7. Erdas Kartal, E., Cobern, W. W., Dogan, N., Irez, S., Cakmakci, G., & Yalaki, Y. (2018). Improving science teachers’ nature of science views through an innovative continuing professional development program. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0125-4
  8. Kampourakis, K. (2020). Students’ “teleological misconceptions” in evolution education: Why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z
  9. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10036
  10. Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. G. (2007). Relationship between instructional context and views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 939-961. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601110947
  11. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
  12. Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  13. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2019). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.
  14. Murphy, D. R. (2017). Effects of explicit-reflective instruction on preservice and novice teachers’ epistemic and conceptual change mediated by reasoning [Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas].
  15. Ogunniyi, M. M. (2023). Culturally responsive science education for indigenous and ethnic minority students. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 389-410). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855758-16