Research Article

Symbolic representations of the environment using texts and visuals in three environmental programs on Nigerian television stations

Ifedolapo Ademosu 1 , Eric Msughter Aondover 1 * , Helen A. Bodunde 2 , Bosede Sotiloye 2
More Detail
1 Department of Mass Communication, Caleb University, Imota, Lagos State, NIGERIA2 Institute of Communication and General Studies, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Adzho, Ogun State, NIGERIA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), June 2026, 15-22, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/17877
Submitted: 12 May 2025, Published: 06 February 2026
OPEN ACCESS   17 Views   6 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Television programs are not just figments of the imaginations of television producers and their presenters, they are representations of the reality that has been perceived in their environment. Visuals and texts are tools and symbolic representations of reality based on the knowledge drawn from the society around them. Using the social construction of reality as a theoretical foundation, this study tried to assess: how meaning is textually presented in selected episodes of the three environmental programs? And how do the visuals of the sign-in intro of the three environmental programs represent the environment? This was done using 4 episodes each of the three programs making a total of twelve for the thematic analysis and one episode of each of the three environmental programs. Data was obtained using thematic analysis of transcribed content from the selected episodes (frequency counts and percentages) and paired sample t-test statistics used to analyze data. Findings include the combined importance of texts and images to explain the issues of the environment being discussed. The thematic analysis indicated that people, environment and climate were the major issues identified across the twelve episodes in the word cloud, tree map and percentage frequency count. Additionally, images are also not just about the elements but also the colors and what they represent. Blue and green were predominantly used in the visual sign-in introductions of the three programs. Eco Africa used the visuals to depict the change they want to see, while the other two programs were majorly representations of the existing environmental issue and challenges. The study recommended that producers and presenters use text and images based on symbols predominant in their society to ensure that there is no disconnect with their audiences.
Keywords: representation, visuals, climate, people, environment, themes

CITATION (APA)

Ademosu, I., Aondover, E. M., Bodunde, H. A., & Sotiloye, B. (2026). Symbolic representations of the environment using texts and visuals in three environmental programs on Nigerian television stations. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/17877

REFERENCES

  1. Akpan, C. S., Anorue, L. I., & Ukonu, M. O. (2012). An analysis of the influence of the Nigerian mass media on public understanding of climate change. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 4(4), 688-710.
  2. Ballantyne, A. G., Wibeck, V., & Neset, T. S. (2016). Images of climate change – A pilot study of young people’s perceptions of ICT-based climate visualization. Climate Change, 134, 73-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1533-9
  3. BON. (2021). Registered members of Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria. https://bon.ng/radio-tv-member/
  4. Boykoff, M. T., & Goodman, M. K. (2015). Science (and policy) friction: How mass media shape US American climate discourses. In B. Sommer (Ed.), Cultural dynamics of climate change and the environment in Northern America (pp. 189-205). Koninklijke Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004300712_009
  5. Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715421
  6. Calhoun, C., Gerteis, J., Moody, J., Pfaff, S., & Virk, I. (Eds.) (2012). Contemporary sociological theory. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  7. Channels TV (2023a). Earthfile. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idDxogkyvCI
  8. Channels TV (2023b). Eco Africa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPSkc9iHSIY
  9. Hansen, A., & Machin, D. (2015). Visual environmental communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753492
  10. Jerry, A., & Atieno, L. (2016). Climate change images in Kenya’s news photographic representations. International Journal of Weather, Climate Change and Conservation Research, 2(2), 1-11.
  11. Johnson, C., Hills, M., & Dempsey, L. (2023). An audience studies’ contribution to the discoverability and prominence debate: Seeking UK TV audiences’ ‘routes to content’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 30(5), 1625-1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231222605
  12. Josserand, M., Meeussen, E., Majid, A., & Dediu, D. (2021). Environment and culture shape both the colour lexicon and the genetics of colour perception. Scientific Reports, 11, Article 19095. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98550-3
  13. León, B., & Erviti, M.C. (2015). Science in pictures: Visual representation of climate change in Spain’s television news. Public Understanding of Science, 24(2), 183-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513500196
  14. McQuail, D. (2011). Mass communication theory. SAGE.
  15. mediaReach. (2016). Media facts: Nigeria, West and Central Africa. mediaReach OMD.
  16. Milstein, T., Pileggi, M., & Morgan, E. L. (2017). Environmental communication pedagogy and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315562148
  17. Morley, D. G., & Jin, H. (2011). British cultural studies, active audiences and the status of cultural theory: An interview with David Morley. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(4), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411398268
  18. Murdock, G. (2017). Encoding and decoding. In The international encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1-11). John Wiley and Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0113
  19. Nigerian Television Authority (2023). Environment Matters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2xLkOc9TfI
  20. Obasi, M. C., & Msughter, A. E. (2023). Assessment of media coverage of environmental hazards in mining communities in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Environmental Challenges, 13, Article 100758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100758
  21. Radermacher, M. (2024). Texts and images as data in qualitative social research: Proposing a common methodological approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241233170
  22. Rasid, R., Djafar, H., & Santoso, B. (2021). Alfred Schutz’s perspective in phenomenology approach: Concepts, characteristics, methods and examples. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2(1), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i1.18
  23. UNEP. (2012). 21 issues for the 21st century: Result of the UNEP foresight process on emerging environmental issues. UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/21-issues-21st-century-results-unep-foresight-process-emerging-environmental
  24. van Beek, L., Metze, T., Kunseler, E., Huitzing, H., de Blois, F., & Wardekker, A. (2020). Environmental visualizations: Framing and reframing between science, policy and society. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.011
  25. Wilson, P. (2024). The role of the broadcast media in the management of environmental health issues in Enugu State, Nigeria. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4694450
  26. Woroniecki, S., Wendo, H., Brink, E., Islar, M., Krause, T., Vargas, A., & Mahmoud, Y. (2020). Nature unsettled: How knowledge and power shape ‘nature-based’ approaches to societal challenges. Global Environmental Change, 65, Article 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102132
  27. Zhao, H. (2020). Explicating the social constructionist perspective on crisis communication and crisis management research: A review of communication and business journals. Journal of Public Relations Research, 32(3–4), 98–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2020.1802732