Review Article

Reimagining chemistry education: A meta-analysis of competency-based teaching and its influence on student attitudes and motivation

Maxwell Gyamfi 1 , Abraham Kamolo Blepo 1 * , Anaane Issah Amidu 1 , Theresa Adamado 1
More Detail
1 Akenten Appiah Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Kumasi, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), June 2026, 23-29, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/18254
Submitted: 21 November 2024, Published: 26 March 2026
OPEN ACCESS   7 Views   5 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis investigates the impact of competency-based teaching (CBT) approaches on students’ attitudes and motivation toward chemistry education. The study aims to synthesize findings from 25 empirical studies conducted between 2000 and 2023 to determine the effectiveness of this approach in diverse educational settings. Using a systematic literature search and well-defined inclusion criteria, the analysis includes both experimental and quasi-experimental designs with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 1,500 participants. Effect sizes were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed through statistical metrics such as I² and funnel plots. The findings indicate that CBT significantly improves students’ attitudes toward chemistry (mean effect size = 0.58, p < 0.01) and enhances motivation (mean effect size = 0.65, p < 0.01), particularly in areas such as intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, and mastery goal orientation. Subgroup and moderator analyses revealed stronger effects among high school students and in studies with high implementation fidelity. Key contributing factors to these positive outcomes included student-centered learning, real-world applications, and personalized pacing. The results suggest that competency-based approaches hold substantial promises for enhancing engagement and learning outcomes in chemistry, provided that adequate teacher training and resources are in place.

CITATION (APA)

Gyamfi, M., Blepo, A. K., Amidu, A. I., & Adamado, T. (2026). Reimagining chemistry education: A meta-analysis of competency-based teaching and its influence on student attitudes and motivation. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/18254

REFERENCES

  1. Abun, D., Magallanes, T., Encarnacion, M. J., Alkalde, F., & Somera, K. A. (2019). Investigation of the cognitive and affective attitude of students toward the environment and their environmental behavioral intention to join the environmental movement and energy conservation. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(6), 110-129.
  2. Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
  3. Almendra, M. R. (2019). Competency-based learning for motivation and academic performance in a pre-calculus course. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-1-9
  4. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
  5. Block, J. H., & Burns, R. B. (1976). Mastery learning. Review of Research in Education, 4, 3-49. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X004001003
  6. Burch, G. F., Giambatista, R., Batchelor, J. H., Burch, J. J., Hoover, J. D., & Heller, N. A. (2019). A meta‐analysis of the relationship between experiential learning and learning outcomes. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 17(3), 239-273. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12188
  7. Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. The Guilford Publications.
  8. Colson, R., & Hirumi, A. (2018). A framework for the design of online competency-based education to promote student engagement. In Student engagement and participation: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 203-220). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2584-4.ch010
  9. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
  10. Dodier, S. (2020). Perspectives on the competency-driven reform in British Columbia: A case study of the science teacher education program at SFU [Master’s thesis, Simon Frasier University].
  11. Edjlali, M. (1990). The effects of competency-based mastery learning on aptitude; motivation; self-esteem; and math anxiety. University of Kentucky.
  12. Ferrell, B., & Barbera, J. (2015). Analysis of students’ self-efficacy, interest, and effort beliefs in general chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(2), 318-337. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00152D
  13. Geelan, D., Mahaffy, P., & Mukherjee, M. (2014). Scientific visualizations: For developing students’ understanding of concepts in chemistry: Some findings and some lessons learned. Teaching Science, 60(1), 30-38. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/68166/
  14. George, R., & Kaplan, D. (1998). A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. Science Education, 82(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199801)82:1<93::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-W
  15. Glass, G. V. (1977). 9: Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5(1), 351-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X005001351
  16. Hanson, R., & Acquah, S. (2014). Enhancing concept understanding through the use of microchemistry equipment and collaborative activities. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(12), 120-130.
  17. Henri, M., Johnson, M. D., & Nepal, B. (2017). A review of competency-based learning: Tools, assessments, and recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 607-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20180
  18. Hoban, K. (2017). Priorities in transitioning to competency-based education in the k-12 digital learning environment: A Delphi study [PhD thesis, University of West Georgia).
  19. Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2011). High-school students’ attitudes toward and interest in learning chemistry. Educación Química, 22(2), 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30121-6
  20. Ituma, M. G. (2022). Developing instructional processes for competency-based learning of integrated science at junior secondary school in Kenya. Competency, 13(35), 9-23.
  21. Kim, T.-E., Munim, Z. H., & Schramm, H.-J. (2023). Exploring alternative performance evaluation method in nautical simulations. AHFE International, 109, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003155
  22. Kousa, P., Kavonius, R., & Aksela, M. (2018). Low-achieving students’ attitudes toward learning chemistry and chemistry teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00226B
  23. Kramer, T. M. (2021). The use of post-course feedback on mastery learning in a professional development context [PhD thesis, University of Nevada].
  24. Lin-Siegler, X., Ahn, J. N., Chen, J., Fang, F. F. A., & Luna-Lucero, M. (2016). Even Einstein struggled: Effects of learning about great scientists’ struggles on high school students’ motivation to learn science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), Article 314. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000092
  25. Manjong, N. (2023). The impact of competency-based education on educational equity [Master’s thesis, University of Central Florida].
  26. Manurung, H. M., & Manurung, S. (2021). The relationship between learning motivation and learning outcomes of students chemistry of grade XI-MNS in 4 state SHS Pematangsiantar. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(3), 466-471. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.466-471
  27. Miller, N., & Pollock, V. E. (1994). Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 457-483). SAGE.
  28. Morcke, A. M., Dornan, T., & Eika, B. (2013). Outcome (competency) based education: An exploration of its origins, theoretical basis, and empirical evidence. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18, 851-863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9405-9
  29. Mosha, H. J. (2012). A case study of learning materials used to deliver knowledge and skills or competency-based curricula (in Tanzania). Association for the Development of Education in Africa.
  30. Musengimana, J., Kampire, E., & Ntawiha, P. (2021). Factors affecting secondary schools students’ attitudes toward learning chemistry: A review of literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), Article em1931. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9379
  31. Newmes, A. (2019). The effectiveness of personalized competency-based education on student engagement at the secondary level [Master’s thesis, Eastern Illinois University].
  32. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  33. Pajares, F., & Usher, E. L. (2008). Self-efficacy, motivation, and achievement in school from the perspective of reciprocal determinism. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 15, 391-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-7423(08)15012-9
  34. Pardjono, P. (2016). Active learning: The Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky, and constructivist theory perspectives. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 9(3), 105376.
  35. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
  36. Potvin, P., Dumont, J. G., Boucher-Genesse, F., & Riopel, M. (2012). The effects of a competency-based reform curriculum on students’ problem-solving competency and general attitudes and interest towards science and technology. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 20(4), 54-69.
  37. Reyes, P. B., España, R. C. N., & Belecina, R. R. (2014). Towards developing a proposed model of teaching-learning process based on the best practices in chemistry laboratory instruction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 4(1), 83-166.
  38. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
  39. Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Teaching and learning 21st-century skills: Lessons from the learning sciences. A global cities education network report. Asia Society.
  40. Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., & Qureshi, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes, self-efficacy, and experiences in a modified process-oriented guided inquiry learning undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00233A
  41. Voorhees, R. A. (2001). Competency‐Based learning models: A necessary future. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(110), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.7
  42. Woldeamanuel, M. M. (2019). Motivation and attitude towards learning chemistry. African Journal of Chemical Education, 9(2), 70-88.
  43. Zapalska, A. M., & Dabb, H. (2002). Learning styles. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 13(3-4), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J066v13n03_06