Research Article

Investigating the factors impeding senior high school chemistry teachers’ practical work organisation and its implementation

Benjamin Anim-Eduful 1 * , Lilian Adoboah Forson 2
More Detail
1 Department of Science Education, Faculty of Science and Technology Education, College of Education Studies, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GHANA2 Department of Integrated Science Education, University of Education, Winneba, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 5(2), December 2025, 19-32, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16902
Submitted: 22 October 2024, Published: 11 September 2025
OPEN ACCESS   14 Views   7 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Practical work in chemistry is essential for reinforcing theoretical concepts, promoting safe handling of chemicals, developing proficiency in laboratory instrumentation, and cultivating scientific inquiry, manipulative abilities, and enthusiasm for science learning. Despite these benefits, many students miss out on meaningful practical experiences due to challenges in organising and implementing laboratory activities. This study investigated the factors impeding the organisation and implementation of chemistry practical work at the senior high school level. Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-method design, the research collected both quantitative and qualitative data through questionnaires, interviews, and observational checklists. A total of 100 chemistry teachers were selected using simple random and purposive sampling techniques for quantitative and qualitative data collection, respectively. The findings revealed significant barriers, including outdated and poorly equipped laboratories, inadequate funding, a lack of laboratory technicians, the use of general classrooms as laboratories, and limited student interest in practical work. In light of these challenges, the study recommends the provision of modern, well-equipped laboratory facilities with adequate resources, including chemicals and equipment, to enhance the quality and effectiveness of chemistry education. The study’s findings are discussed in detail, along with their implications for practice and educational policy.
Keywords: chemistry practical work, organisation and implementation, teachers

CITATION (APA)

Anim-Eduful, B., & Adoboah Forson, L. (2025). Investigating the factors impeding senior high school chemistry teachers’ practical work organisation and its implementation. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 5(2), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/16902

REFERENCES

  1. Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Anim-Eduful, B. (2022). Interaction effect of gender across school types on upper-secondary students’ development of experimental reasoning in organic qualitative analysis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.351
  2. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Agyei, D. D. (2020). Participatory teaching and learning approach. A framework for teaching redox reactions at high school level. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.106.120
  3. Adu-Gyamfi, K., Arthur, N., & Anim-Eduful, B. (2024). Teacher general pedagogy and subject matter knowledge for teaching qualitative analysis concepts to chemistry students. International Education and Culture Studies, 4(1), 24–45.
  4. Aksoy, H., & Çetinkaya, Y. B. (2025). Investigating the association between technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and self-efficacy among Turkish EFL prep school teachers. Contemporary English Language Studies, 1(1), 1–21.
  5. Aldridge, J., & Rowley, K. (2016). Student engagement: A theoretical framework for practical chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(5), 783–791.
  6. Allison, S., Ashford-Rowe, K., Gray, D., & Williams, P. (2017). How universities can help students to get ahead in the jobs market. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 8(1), 120–133.
  7. American Chemical Society (2018). American Chemical Society guidelines and recommendations for the teaching of high school chemistry. ACS. https://www.acs.org/education/policies/middle-and-high-school-chemistry.html
  8. Angraini, L. M., Kania, N., & Gürbüz, F. (2024). Students’ proficiency in computational thinking through constructivist learning theory. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijmme.v2i1.963
  9. Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2021). Functional groups detection: Do chemistry teachers demonstrate conceptual difficulties in teaching? Global Journal of Human Social Science-G Linguistics & Education, 21(7), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSGVOL21IS7PG47
  10. Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022). Factors influencing high school chemistry teachers’ and students’ teaching and learning of organic qualitative analysis: A qualitative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7), 194–219. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i7.4378
  11. Assifuah, G. E., & Anim-Eduful, B. (2025). Enhancing high school chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of hybridisation using multimedia instructional strategies. Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.12973/jmste.2.1.69
  12. Atud, F. M. R., Cabrera, R. M., & Calzada, M. P. T. (2025). Teachers’ profile, knowledge competence, and skill competence in laboratory instruction; its implications to physics teaching. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(4), 2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.04.33
  13. Barakat, H., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2019). The impact of large class size on students’ academic achievement in Jordanian public schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(5), 1–13.
  14. Barakat, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Alqarni, A. (2019). Teachers’ perception of the role of science practical work in promoting scientific concepts among students. Education Sciences, 9(2), Article 150.
  15. Baroud, N., & Aljarmi, A. (2025). Enhancing students understanding of hybridization in organic compounds through a flipped classroom approach combined with game-based learning. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 20(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v20i3.8725
  16. Barton, R. (2018). IT in practical work. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science (pp 237–251). Routledge.
  17. Bruner, J. S. (1960). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
  18. Castro, R. (2025). The effects of chemistry virtual laboratories in academic achievement of secondary level learners: A meta-analysis. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379
  19. Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2025). Examination of multimedia learning principles in augmented reality and virtual reality learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13097
  20. Coffie, I. S., Hopwood, N., & Lai, M. N. (2025). Science teachers’ professional learning and changing practices in the context of curriculum reform in Ghana. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 29(1) 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2024.2449301
  21. Costabile, M., Birbeck, D., & Aitchison, C. (2025). Using simulations to meld didactic and constructivist teaching methods in complex second year STEM courses. International Journal of Science Education, 47(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2314010
  22. Cresswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
  23. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Collier-McMillan Canada Ltd.
  24. Diasse, M. D., & Kawai, N. (2025). Barriers to curriculum accessibility for students with visual impairment in general education setting: The experience of lower secondary school students in Senegal. The Curriculum Journal, 36(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.269
  25. Dogar, S. R., Maryam, A., & Bajwa, M. J. (2025). Exploring the challenges faced by secondary-level students in learning science: A case study of biology. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 9(1), 305–319.
  26. Driana, E. (2025). The utilization of virtual laboratories in science education at junior secondary schools in Tangerang Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(1), 876–886. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i1.9075
  27. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2014). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
  28. Haung, Y. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2018). Review of research on laboratory learning environments: What do we know about their effects on students’ attitudes and achievements in science? In M.-H. Chiu (Ed.), Science education research and practice in Asia: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 105–133). Springer.
  29. Hofstein A., Kipnis, M., & Abrahams, I. Z. (2013). How to learn in and from the chemistry laboratory. In A. Hofstein, & I. Eilks (Eds.), Teaching chemistry–A studybook (pp. 153–182). Sense Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-140-5_6
  30. Jumaah, F. M. (2024). Exploring constructivist learning theory and its applications in teaching English. The American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations, 6(08), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue08-02
  31. Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: Instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 36(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530
  32. Martínez-Bello, V. E., Vega-Perona, H., Robles-Galán, P., Segura-Martínez, P., & Bernabé-Villodre, M. D. M. (2025). Pedagogical content knowledge of movement opportunities in toddler education: Perceptions of early childhood educators and student teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01578-5
  33. MOE. (2010). Teaching syllabus for chemistry: Senior high school. Ministry of Education.
  34. Morgante, P. P., & Autschbach, J. (2023). Molecular orbitals. American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsinfocus.7e7002
  35. Muda, M. A. M., Siburian, J., & Musli. (2025). Improving students’ critical thinking skills using multimedia in a problem-based learning model (PBL): A narrative review. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara Jakarta, 16(2), 245–266.
  36. Ngema, M., & Motlhabane, A. (2025). Virtual labs in life sciences education: A case study of grade 10 learners in selected South African rural schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(2), Article em2579. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15925
  37. Pareek, R. B. (2019). An assessment of availability and utilisation of laboratory facilities for teaching science at secondary level. Science Education International, 30(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i1.9
  38. Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Analysis of causal models explaining science achievement in secondary school students in Quebec (Canada). Research in Science Education, 44(3), 485–505.
  39. Primas, H. (2013). Chemistry, quantum mechanics and reductionism: Perspectives in theoretical chemistry. Springer.
  40. Qodirov, F. (2025). Advantages and disadvantages of immitation training. ACUMEN: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 296–301.
  41. Ross, A. R., & Lewin K. M. (2012). Science kits in developing countries: An appraisal of potential. International Institute for Educational Planning.
  42. Scherer, R., & Werfel, T. (2020). Timetable load: An overview of research and practical solutions. Journal for Educational Research Online, 12(2), 140–157.
  43. Shambare, B., & Jita, T. (2025). Understanding the adoption of virtual labs in rural secondary schools: A descriptive analysis of perceived usefulness, ease of use, and behavioral intentions. Rural Educator, 46(2), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.55533/2643-9662.1490
  44. Solomon, J. (2017). Envisionment in practical work:Helping pupils to imagine concepts while carrying out experiments. In J. Leach, & A. Paulsen (Eds.), Practical work in science education: Recent research studies (pp. 60–74). Roskilde University Press/Kluwer.
  45. Spaan, W., Oostdam, R., Schuitema, J., & Pijls, M. (2022). Analysing teacher behaviour in synthesizing hands-on and minds-on during practical work. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2098265
  46. Spaan, W., Oostdam, R., Schuitema, J., & Pijls, M. (2023). Thinking-back-and-forth in practical work experienced by students: Identifying evidence-informed characteristics of good practices in secondary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 43(1), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2268005
  47. Spaan, W., Oostdam, R., Schuitema, J., & Pijls, M. (2025). Teaching thinking-back-and-forth in practical work: Results of an educational design study in secondary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 45(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2446795
  48. Suryanata, I. P. A., Kertih, I. W., & Lasmawan, I. W. (2025). The effect of project-based learning model on science learning outcomes reviewed from the scientific attitude. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(1), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v16i1.25764
  49. Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E
  50. Ummah, W. T., & Yohamintin, Y. (2025). Integrating scientific attitude to realize pancasila learner profile in science learning. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v6i1.1318
  51. Van Wyk, A. L., Bhinu, A., Frederick, K. A., Lieberman, M., & Cole, R. S. (2025). Bridging the science practices gap: Analyzing laboratory materials for their opportunities for engagement in science practices. Journal of Chemical Education, 102(3), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00744
  52. WAEC. (2013). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  53. WAEC. (2014). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  54. WAEC. (2015). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  55. WAEC. (2016). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  56. WAEC. (2017). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  57. WAEC. (2018). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  58. WAEC. (2019). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  59. WAEC. (2020). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  60. WAEC. (2021). Chief examiner’s report: July/August senior secondary school certificate examination. West African Examinations Council.
  61. Wibowo, S., Wangid, M. N., & Firdaus, F. M. (2025). The relevance of Vygotsky’s constructivism learning theory with the differentiated learning primary schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21197
  62. Yadav, A., Lachney, M., Hill, R., Lapetina, A., Hu, A. D., Jee, H., & Allen Kuyenga, M. C. (2025). Diving into the role: A multi-case study on supporting novice CS teachers’ knowledge through co-teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2404125
  63. Yin, H., & He, Y. (2013). The positive psychology of positive emotions and flourishing in China: A literature review. Psychology, 4(3), 215–224.
  64. Yu, B., Smith, W. C., & Cao, Y. (2025). The relationship between propositional teacher knowledge and classroom teaching practice: The case of Chinese novice mathematics teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 45(1), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2022.2096570
  65. Yusupa, A., Tarigan, V., & Sengkey, D. F. (2025). Development of virtual lab on collision dynamics learning object with collision algorithm integration. Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 9(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i1.8765