Research Article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of flipped learning in constructivism to improve concept understanding in information and computer engineering education

Metta Mariam 1 2 * , Herman Dwi Surjono 1 , Bernardus Sentot Wijanarka 1 , Indra Maulana 1 2
More Detail
1 Yogyakarta State University, Depok, INDONESIA2 Prima Bangsa Institute, Kedawung, INDONESIA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), June 2026, 7-14, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/17777
Submitted: 05 December 2024, Published: 22 January 2026
OPEN ACCESS   17 Views   5 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

This research focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of flipped learning in enhancing concept comprehension among students of the Informatics and Computer Engineering Education Study Program at Invada Institute of Education and Languages. Utilizing a constructivist framework, this study adopts a quasi-experimental approach to compare two groups of students: an experimental group that utilized flipped learning and a control group that followed traditional learning methods. Data were obtained through pre- and post-test measurements to assess concept comprehension before and after the intervention. In flipped learning, learning content is delivered outside of class via digital media such as videos, allowing class time to be used for interactive discussions and problem-solving. This method aligns with constructivist principles advocating active and collaborative learning. The study results reveal a significant improvement in students’ concept comprehension in the experimental group compared to the control group. The experimental group showed a higher average post-test score, proving the effectiveness of the flipped learning strategy in deepening understanding of course material. These findings affirm that flipped learning not only increases student engagement but also strengthens their cognitive abilities in comprehending complex material. Furthermore, the implications of this research suggest that the implementation of flipped learning in the context of engineering education positively contributes to the quality of higher education, especially in the fields of engineering and technology. Thus, the results of this study encourage educators in higher education institutions to adapt the flipped learning approach as a strategic tool for developing more effective curricula. These findings support the importance of innovation in teaching methods to improve student learning outcomes and concept mastery skills.
Keywords: flipped learning, constructivism, learning, classroom

CITATION (APA)

Mariam, M., Surjono, H. D., Wijanarka, B. S., & Maulana, I. (2026). Evaluation of the effectiveness of flipped learning in constructivism to improve concept understanding in information and computer engineering education. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 6(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/17777

REFERENCES

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2014). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  2. Alkaabi, K. (2022). Applying the innovative approach of employing a business simulation game and prototype developing platform in an online flipped classroom of an entrepreneurial summer course: A case study of UAEU. Education Sciences, 13(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010013
  3. Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12353
  4. Awidi, I. T., & Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013
  5. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
  6. Bowen, J. (2014). Teaching naked: How moving technology out of your college classroom will improve student learning. Innovations in Teaching & Learning Conference Proceedings, 6. https://doi.org/10.13021/g8sp5j
  7. Brame, C. J. (2019). Flipping the classroom. In C. J. Brame (Ed.), Science teaching essentials (pp. 121–132). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814702-3.00009-3
  8. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674251083
  9. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
  10. Cheng, C.-Y., Liou, S.-R., Hsu, T.-H., Pan, M.-Y., Liu, H.-C., & Chang, C.-H. (2014). Preparing nursing students to be competent for future professional practice: Applying the team-based learning-teaching strategy. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(4), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.11.005
  11. DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
  12. Dickenson, P. (2014). Flipping the classroom in a teacher education course. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (pp. 145–162). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4987-3.ch008
  13. Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1
  14. Giannakos, M. N., Krogstie, J., & Chrisochoides, N. (2014). Reviewing the flipped classroom research. In Proceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference (pp. 23–29). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2691352.2691354
  15. Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
  16. Herreid, C., Schiller, N., Herreid, K., & Wright, C. (2014). Case study: A chat with the survey monkey: Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_044_01_75
  17. Holroyd, K. B., McDonough, A., Chomba, M., Asukile, M., Chiwaya, N., Vallejos, G., Asmare, S., Braun, S., Chishimba, L., Gebrewold, M. A., Luchembe, M., Mulenga, B., Mwamba, J., Namangala, C., Nassoro, D., Peloso, A., Yankae, L., Zimba, S., Berkowitz, A., & Saylor, D. (2025). Evaluation of a flipped classroom approach to undergraduate neurology medical education in Zambia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 475, Article 123580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2025.123580
  18. Hu, T., Rasool, U., Wang, L., Chen, H., & Shi, H. (2025). The effectiveness of the TikTok flipped classroom method on students’ academic performance in folk art course. Acta Psychologica, 257, Article 105094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105094
  19. Jarutkamolpong, S., & Kwangmuang, P. (2025). Enhancing undergraduate creative thinking through a constructivist mobile learning application: Design, development, and evaluation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57, Article 101866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101866
  20. Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. D. M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 14(1), Article ar5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
  21. Jeong, J. S., Cañada-Cañada, F., & González-Gómez, D. (2018). The study of flipped-classroom for pre-service science teachers. Education Sciences, 8(4), Article 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040163
  22. Kanjug, I., Srisawasdi, N., Chaijaroen, S., & Kanjug, P. (2018). Using constructivist instructional design for flipped classroom to enhancing cognitive learning performance. In T. T. Wu, Y. M. Huang, R. Shadiev, L. Lin, & A. Starčič (Eds.), Innovative technologies and learning. ICITL 2018. Lecture notes in computer science(), vol 11003 (pp. 135–1445). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99737-7_13
  23. Kaplan, B. (1971). Genetic psychology, genetic epistemology, and theory of knowledge. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 61–81). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-498640-4.50007-x
  24. Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
  25. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
  26. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
  27. Long, T., Logan, J., & Waugh, M. (2016). Students’ perceptions of the value of using videos as a pre-class learning experience in the flipped classroom. TechTrends, 60(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
  28. Lopez, S. (2022). Book review–Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day by Jonathan Bergmann & Aaron Sams. Electronic Journal of Social and Strategic Studies, 3(2), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.47362/ejsss.2022.3208
  29. Maimaiti, G., & Hew, K. F. (2025). Gamification bolsters self-regulated learning, learning performance and reduces strategy decline in flipped classrooms: A longitudinal quasi-experiment. Computers & Education, 230, Article 105278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105278
  30. Moraros, J., Islam, A., Yu, S., Banow, R., & Schindelka, B. (2015). Flipping for success: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Medical Education, 15, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0317-2
  31. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063
  32. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
  33. Oigara, J. N. (2018). Integrating virtual reality tools into classroom instruction. In Advances in educational technologies and instructional design (pp. 147–159). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3949-0.ch008
  34. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x024007005
  35. Prawat, R. S., & Floden, R. E. (1994). Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of learning. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2901_4
  36. Rahman, N. A. A., Hussein, N., & Aluwi, A. H. (2015). Satisfaction on blended learning in a public higher education institution: What factors matter? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 768–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.107
  37. Reigeluth, C. M. (2013). Instructional-design theories and models. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784
  38. Robbins, M. M., Onodipe, G. O., & Marks, A. (2020). Reflective writing and self-regulated learning in multidisciplinary flipped classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(3), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i3.27541
  39. Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/jfcs105.2.12
  40. Ronaghi, M. H. (2024). A new approach to business ethics education: Virtual reality-based flipped learning. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), Article 101076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101076
  41. SRIVASTAVA, K. (2012). Role of flipped classroom in education. Paripex-Indian Journal of Research, 3(4), 81–83. https://doi.org/10.15373/22501991/apr2014/27
  42. Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
  43. Ukwandu, E., Omisade, O., Jones, K., Thorne, S., & Castle, M. (2025). The future of teaching and learning in the context of emerging artificial intelligence technologies. Futures, 171, Article 103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103616
  44. van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 14(3), Article ar26. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-09-0141
  45. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1997). Book reviews: FOSNOT, C. T. (Ed.) (1996). Constructivism, theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(3), 113–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100308
  46. Velegol, S., & Zappe, S. (n.d.). How does a flipped classroom impact classroom climate? In Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25479
  47. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00869951
  48. Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Biographical note on. In L. S. Vygotsky (Ed.), Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (pp. 15–16). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.5
  49. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131
  50. Yilmaz, R. M., Baydas, O., Karakus, T., & Goktas, Y. (2015). An examination of interactions in a three-dimensional virtual world. Computers & Education, 88, 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.002
  51. Zainuddin, Z. (2017). First-year college students’ experiences in the EFL flipped classroom: A case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1019a
  52. Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
  53. Zhou, Q., Wang, B., & Mayer, I. (2024). Understanding the social construction of the metaverse with Q methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, Article 123716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123716