Research Article

Assessing Ghanaian primary school pupils’ scientific reasoning skills

Augustine Owusu Achiaw 1 * , Kofi Acheaw Owusu 1
More Detail
1 Science Education Department, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GHANA* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), December 2023, 99-107, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13886
Published: 10 November 2023
OPEN ACCESS   511 Views   307 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Science education seeks to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills needed to solve problems in society. To be successful in solving problems, one has to develop scientific reasoning skills. Although scientific reasoning skills are emphasized in the Ghanaian science curriculum, it is not explicitly taught, making it difficult to determine whether Ghanaian school children have developed them. This study, therefore, sought to assess the scientific reasoning skills of primary school pupils in Ghana. In doing so, efforts were made to investigate if differences existed in the scientific reasoning skills of boys and girls in different class levels in primary schools. A cross-sectional survey of 1,066 primary school pupils from 10 schools in Kumasi Metropolis in Ghana was conducted using the science P reasoning inventory. Means, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, and one-way multivariate analysis of variance were the statistical tools used to analyze the data obtained. The study revealed that class 4 and class 5 pupils demonstrated naïve scientific reasoning skills while class 6 pupils exhibited an intermediate level of scientific reasoning skills with no difference between boys and girls in each class. The study’s findings highlight the need for a carefully structured and progressive curriculum that effectively develops scientific reasoning skills as pupils advance through different grade levels.

CITATION (APA)

Owusu Achiaw, A., & Owusu, K. A. (2023). Assessing Ghanaian primary school pupils’ scientific reasoning skills. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13886

REFERENCES

  1. Abate, T., Michael, K., & Angell, C. (2020). Assessment of scientific reasoning: Development and validation of scientific reasoning assessment tool. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9353.
  2. Adey, P., & Csapó, B. (2012). Developing and assessing scientific reasoning. In B. Csapó, & G. Szabó (Eds.), Framework for diagnostic assessment of science (pp.17–53). Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó [National Textbook Publisher].
  3. Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K‐12 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902717283
  4. Alabi, A. T., & Jelili, M. O. (2023). Clarifying Likert scale misconceptions for improved application in urban studies. Quality & Quantity, 57(2), 1337-1350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01415-8
  5. Alemu, M., Kind, P., Tadesse, M., Atnafu, M., & Michael, K. (2017). Challenges of science teacher education in low-income nations-The case Ethiopia. Part 13: Strand, 13, 1782.
  6. Amoah, C. A., & Eshun, E. (2018). Assessing the reasoning skills of biology students in selected senior high schools in the central region of Ghana. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(04), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i4.el12
  7. Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Wu, N. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323(5914), 586-587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167740
  8. Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if it works: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110504
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053
  10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Action research. In L. Cohen, L. Manion, & K. Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in education (pp. 440-456). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539-22
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.
  12. Engelmann, K., Neuhaus, B. J., & Fischer, F. (2016). Fostering scientific reasoning in education–Meta-analytic evidence from intervention studies. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(5-6), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1240089
  13. Fisher, C. D. (1985). Social support and adjustment to work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Management, 11(3), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638501100304
  14. Han, J. (2013). Scientific reasoning: Research, development, and assessment [Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University].
  15. Johnson, M. H. (2001). Functional brain development in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 475-483. https://doi.org/10.1038/35081509
  16. Kambeyo, L. (2018). Assessing Namibian students’ abilities in scientific reasoning, scientific inquiry and inductive reasoning skills [Doctoral Thesis, University of Szeged]. Hungary. http://doktori. bibl.uszeged.hu/9987/1/Kambeyo_Dissertation_2018.pdf
  17. Koerber, S., Mayer, D., Osterhaus, C., Schwippert, K., & Sodian, B. (2015). The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: A comprehensive inventory. Child Development, 86(1), 327-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12298
  18. Koerber, S., Sodian, B., Thoermer, C., & Nett, U. (2005). Scientific reasoning in young children: Preschoolers’ ability to evaluate covariation evidence. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.141
  19. Korom, E., Németh, M., Pásztor, A., & Csapó, B. (2017). Relationship between scientific and inductive reasoning in grades 5 and 7. In Proceedings of the 17th Biennial conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 128-129).
  20. Kuhn, D. (2001). Why development does (and does not) occur: Evidence from the domain of inductive reasoning. In Mechanisms of cognitive development (pp. 233-262). Psychology Press.
  21. Kuhn, D. (2002). What is scientific thinking and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), The blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Blackwell Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996652.ch17
  22. Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
  23. Kuhn, J., & Holling, H. (2009). Gender, reasoning ability, and scholastic achievement: A multilevel mediation analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.007
  24. Lawson, A. E. (1992). What do tests of “formal” reasoning actually measure? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 965-983. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290906
  25. Lawson, A. E. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052117
  26. Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
  27. Layng, T. J. (2016). Converging qualities of personal competencies. Handbook on personalized learning for states, districts, and schools, 19-36.
  28. Lazonder, A. W., & Wiskerke-Drost, S. (2015). Advancing scientific reasoning in upper elementary classrooms: Direct instruction versus task structuring. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9522-8
  29. Lemke, C. (2002). enGauge 21st century skills: Digital literacy for digital age. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED463753
  30. Manikandan, S. (2010). Data transformation. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics, 1(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.72373
  31. Morris, B. J., Croker, S., Masnick, A. M., & Zimmerman, C. (2012). The emergence of scientific reasoning. In Current topics in children’s learning and cognition. IntechOpen.
  32. Muslu Kaygisiz, G., Gurkan, B., & Akbas, U. (2018). Adaptation of scientific reasoning scale into Turkish and examination of its psychometric properties. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 737-757. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.3.0175
  33. National Council and Assessment [NaCCA]. (2019). Science Curriculum for Primary Schools (Basic 4-6). Accra: MoE.
  34. Novia, N., & Riandi, R. (2017). The analysis of students’ scientific reasoning ability in solving the modified Lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning (MLCTSR) problems by applying the levels of inquiry. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia [Indonesian Science Education Journal], 6(1), 116-122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.9600
  35. Nyberg, K., Koerber, S., & Osterhaus, C. (2020). How to measure scientific reasoning in primary school: A comparison of different test modalities. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9552
  36. OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Publishing.
  37. Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., & Sodian, B. (2020). The science-P reasoning inventory (SPR-I): Measuring emerging scientific-reasoning skills in primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 10871107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1748251
  38. Osterhaus, C., Magee, J., Saffran, A., & Alibali, M. W. (2019). Supporting successful interpretations of covariation data: Beneficial effects of variable symmetry and problem context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(5), 994-1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818775909
  39. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS program (4th ed.). McGraw-hill education (UK). Open University Press.
  40. Riyanti, H., Suciati, S., & Karyanto, P. (2018). Enhancing students’ logical-thinking ability in natural science learning with a generative learning model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(3), 648-654. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v10i3.16612
  41. Schiefer, J., Golle, J., Tibus, M., & Oschatz, K. (2019). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment of the inquiry cycle. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 144-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18825152
  42. Sodian, B., Taylor, C., Harris, P. L., & Perner, J. (1991). Early deception and the child’s theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62(3), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131124
  43. Thoron, A. C., & Myers, B. E. (2012). Effects of inquiry-based agriscience instruction on student scientific reasoning. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(4), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.04175
  44. Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
  45. Valanides, N. C. (1996). Formal reasoning and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 96(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15818.x
  46. Varma, K. (2014). Supporting scientific experimentation and reasoning in young elementary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23, 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9470-8
  47. Wenning, C. J., & Vieyra, R. E. (2015). Teaching high school physics. Rebecca Vieyra. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735422018
  48. Yang, F. Y. (2004). Exploring high school students' use of theory and evidence in an everyday context: the role of scientific thinking in environmental science decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1345-1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000205404
  49. Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
  50. Zulkipli, Z. A., Yusof, M. M. M., Ibrahim, N., & Dalim, S. F. (2020). Identifying scientific reasoning skills of science education students. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 275-280. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10311