Review Article

Alternative ideas about concepts of physics, a timelessly valuable tool for physics education

Konstantinos T. Kotsis 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, GREECE* Corresponding Author
Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), December 2023, 83-97, https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13776
Published: 12 October 2023
OPEN ACCESS   691 Views   319 Downloads
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Alternative ideas, defined as faulty or incomplete understandings of scientific concepts, are prevalent among students across all age groups and educational levels. In physics, misconceptions often arise from everyday experiences, intuitive reasoning, and oversimplified analogies. The persistence of misconceptions in students’ understanding of physics concepts can hinder learning and compromise scientific literacy. Consequently, research on alternative ideas has emerged as a critical aspect of science education, informing teaching strategies and curriculum development. At the beginning of this research, a brief historical report is presented on how research began in the field of the didactic of physics. Then a report is presented with research that led to the identification of alternative ideas at various levels of education. Finally, modern studies on the alternative ideas on the concepts of physics and their conclusions are presented and highlight the timeless necessity of the scientific research of alternative ideas and students’ perceptions of physics concepts, proving how valuable it is for physics education in the search for this topic.
Keywords: alternative ideas, misconceptions, physics education

CITATION (APA)

Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Alternative ideas about concepts of physics, a timelessly valuable tool for physics education. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13776

REFERENCES

  1. Adeniyi, E. O. (1985). Misconceptions of selected ecological concepts held by some Nigerian students. Journal of Biological Education, 19(4), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1985.9654758
  2. Ambrose, B. S., Shaffer, P. S., Steinberg, R. N., & McDermott, L. C. (1999). An investigation of student understanding of single-slit diffraction and double-slit interference. American Journal of Physics, 67(2), 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19210
  3. Andreou, Y., & Kotsis, K. T. (2005a). The estimation of length, surface area and volume by blind and sighted children. International Congress Series, 1282, 780-784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.05.027
  4. Andreou, Y., & Kotsis, K. T. (2005b). The perception of basic science concepts by blind and sighted children. International Journal of Learning, 12(1), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v12i01/47458
  5. Appleton, K. (1995). Student teachers’ confidence to teach science: Is more science knowledge necessary to improve self‐confidence? International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 357-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170307
  6. Arons, A. B. (1996). Teaching introductory physics. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Facilitating meaningful verbal learning in the classroom. The Arithmetic Teacher, 15(2), 126-132. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.15.2.0126
  8. Barbas, A., & Psillos, D. (1997). Causal reasoning as a base for advancing a systemic approach to simple electrical circuits. Research in Science Education, 27(3), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02461764
  9. Barbas, A., & Psillos, D. (2002). Evolution of students’ reasoning about microscopic processes in electrostatics under the influence of interactive simulations. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48196-0_25
  10. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Beder, H. W., & Darkenwald, G. G. (1982). Differences between teaching adults and pre-adults: Some propositions and findings. Adult Education, 32(3), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368203200303
  12. Bernhard, J. (2000). Improving engineering physics teaching–Learning from physics education research [Invited talk]. Physics Teaching in Engineering Education.
  13. Bisdikian, G., & Psillos, D. (2002). Enhancing the linking of theoretical knowledge to physical phenomena by real-time graphing. In D. Psillos, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48196-0_21
  14. Boyes E., Stanisstreet M., & Papantoniou V. (1999). The ideas of Greek high school students about the ozone layer. Science Education, 83(6), 724-737. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<724::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-P
  15. Brass, C., Gunstone, R., & Fensham, P. (2003). Quality learning of physics: Conceptions held by high school and university teachers. Research in Science Education, 33, 245-271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025038314119
  16. Brown, D. (1989). Students’ concept of force: The importance of understanding Newton’s third law. Physics Education, 24, 353. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/24/6/007
  17. Burge, E. J. (1967). Misconceptions in nuclear physics. Physics Education, 2(4), 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/2/4/302
  18. Christidou, V., & Grammenos, S. (2000). Primary school students’ perceptions of air pollution: Conceptual barriers and didactic implications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Education in the Context of 21st Century Education (pp. 320-326).
  19. Christidou, V., & Hatzinikita, V. (2006). Pre-school children’s explanations of plant growth and rain formation: A comparative analysis. Research in Science Education, 36, 187-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9006-1
  20. Christonasis, A., Stylos, G., Chatzimitakos, T., Kasouni, A., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Religiosity and teachers’ acceptance of the big bang theory. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education, 3(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13043
  21. Claxton, G. (1993). Minitheories: A preliminary model for learning science. In P. J. Black, & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s informal ideas in science (pp. 45-61). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203039625
  22. Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12989
  23. Cliridis, E. (1998). Perceptions of primary education teachers regarding the phenomena of shadow and shadow. In P. Koumaras, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, & D. Psyllos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Panhellenic Conference: Teaching of Natural Sciences and Application of New Technologies in Education (pp. 557-563). Christodoulidis Publications.
  24. Clough, E. E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education, 70, 473-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730700412
  25. Cochran, K., & Jones, L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of pre-service science teachers. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707-718). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_41
  26. De Jong, O., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (1998). Research on science teacher education in Europe: Teacher thinking and conceptual change. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 745-758). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_44
  27. Dekkers, P. J. J. M., & Thijs, G. D. (1998). Making productive use of students’ initial conceptions in developing the concept of force. Science Education, 82(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199801)82:1<31::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-1
  28. Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1986). Student’s thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. Scholl Science Review, 67, 443-456.
  29. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267808559857
  30. Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268308559904
  31. Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions of the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501
  32. Driver, R., Guesne, E. T., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas and learning science. In R. Driver, E. Guesne, & A. Tiberghien (Eds.), Children’s ideas in science. Open University Press.
  33. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson V. (1998). Constructing science concepts. A global compendium of student ideas. Publications Typothito-Dardanos.
  34. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-12.
  35. Duit, R. (1993). Research on students’ conceptions–Developments and trends. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics.
  36. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science: From behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3-25). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4940-2_1
  37. Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, 69, S54-S64. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1377283
  38. Enderstein, L. G., & Spango, P. E. (1996). Beliefs regarding force and motion: A longitudinal and cross-cultural study of South African school pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180406
  39. Feher, E., & Rice, K. (1988). Shadows and anti-images: Children’s conceptions of light and vision II. Science Education, 72(5), 637-649. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720509
  40. Fleury, S. C., & Bentley, M. L. (1991). Educating elementary science teachers: Alternative conceptions of the nature of science. Teaching Education, 3, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621910030207
  41. Flogaiti, E. (1993). Environmental education. Hellenic University Press.
  42. Fortner, R. W., Lee, J.-Y., Corney, J. R., Romanello, S., Bonnell, J., Luthy, B., Figuerido, C., & Ntsiko, N. (2000). Public understanding of climate change. Environmental Education Research, 6(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/713664673
  43. Galili, I. (1996). Students’ conceptual change in geometrical optics. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 847-868. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180709
  44. Galili, I., & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force: Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140107
  45. Gartzonika, A., & Kotsis, K. T. (2004). The perceptions of primary education teachers about the buoyancy of liquids. In Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference on Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education (pp. 435-443).
  46. Gavrilakis, C., Stylos, G., Kotsis, K. T., & Goulgouti, A. (2017). Environmental literacy assessment of Greek university pre-service teachers. Science Education: Research and Praxis, 61, 49-71.
  47. Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M. (2022a). Attitudes and behaviors of university students towards electromagnetic radiation of cell phones and wireless networks. Aquademia, 6(2), ep22009. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/12393
  48. Gavrilas, L., Kotsis, K. T., & Papanikolaou, M. (2022b). Gender differences in attitudes and behaviors associated with electromagnetic radiation of mobile phones and wireless networks. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 4(5), 25-37.
  49. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51-94). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_3
  50. Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children’s science and its consequence for teaching. Science Education, 66, 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660412
  51. Ginns, I., & Watters, J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of pre-service elementary teacher education students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320209
  52. Glinavos, Z., Kotsis, K. T., & Stylos, G. (2020). Secondary school students’ vaccine literacy and factors associated with vaccine attitudes. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 2(8), 82‐92.
  53. Goldring, H., & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/29/1/006
  54. Gontas, P., Gavrilas, L., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of renewable energy sources. Science and Technology Issues in Education, 14, 37-48.
  55. Goulgouti, A., Plakitsi, A., & Stylos, G. (2019b). Environmental literacy: Evaluating knowledge, affect, and behavior of pre-service teachers in Greece. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 15(1), e02202. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/6287
  56. Graham, T., & Berry, J. (1996). A hierarchical model of the development of student understanding of momentum. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180107
  57. Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992). Grade 12 students’ misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290609
  58. Guisasola, J., Zubimendi, J. L., Almudí, J. M., & Ceberio, M. (2002). The evolution of the concept of capacitance throughout the development of the electric theory and the understanding of its meaning by university students. Science & Education, 11, 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015248831346
  59. Gunstone, R. F. (1987). Student understanding in mechanics: A large population survey. American Journal of Physics, 55(8), 691-696. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15058
  60. Gustafson, F. B., & Rowell M. P. (1995). Elementary pre-service teachers: Constructing conceptions about learning science, teaching science and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 589-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170504
  61. Gοulgouti, A., Plakitsi, A., Stylos, G., Gavrilakis, K., & Kotsis, K. T. (2019a). Environmental literacy in Greece: The attitude of future teachers towards the environment. Science Teaching: Research and Practice, 68-69, 37-51.
  62. Hake, R. R. (1992). Socratic pedagogy in the introductory physics laboratory. Physics Teacher, 33, 546-552. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343637
  63. Halkia, K. (2003). Teachers’ views and attitudes towards the communication code and the rhetoric used in press science articles. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5_43
  64. Halkia, K., & Kalkanis, G. (1998). Buoyancy: A concept so “easy” and so “difficult” in its approach. In P. Koumaras, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, & D. Psyllos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Panhellenic Conference: Teaching of Natural Sciences and Application of New Technologies in Education (pp. 364-369). Christodoulidis Publications.
  65. Halloun, I. A. (1998). Schematic concepts for schematic models of the real world: The Newtonian concepts of force. Science Education, 82(2), 239-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:2<239::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-F
  66. Halloun, I. A. (2000). Model-laden inquiry for effective physics instruction. Themes in Education, 1(4), 339-355.
  67. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056-1065. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14031
  68. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1985b). The initial knowledge state of students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1055. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14030
  69. Halloun, I. A., & Hestenes, D. (1987). Modeling instruction in mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 55(5), 455-462. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15130
  70. Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316-1325. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18376
  71. Hatzinikita, V., Koulaidis, V., & Ravanis, K. (1996). Pre-school and primary school students’ ideas about boiling water. Exploring the Child’s World, 2, 106-116.
  72. Heller, P. M. (1987). Use of core propositions in solving current electricity problems. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (pp. 225-235).
  73. Helm, H. (1980). Misconceptions in physics amongst South African students. Physics Education, 15, 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/15/2/308
  74. Hicks, R. B., & Laue, H. (1989). A computer-assisted approach to learning physics concepts. American Journal of Physics, 57(9), 807-811. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15897
  75. Hung, W., & Jonassen, D. H. (2006). Conceptual understanding of causal reasoning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1601-1621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560902
  76. Itza-Ortiz, S., Rebello, S., & Zollman, D. (2004). Students’ models of Newton’s second law in mechanics and electromagnetism. European Journal of Physics, 25, 81. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/25/1/011
  77. Jimoyiannis, A. (1999a). Teaching physics and computers. An alternative teaching approach (part 1). Contemporary Education, 105, 115-122.
  78. Jimoyiannis, A. (1999b). Teaching physics and computers. An alternative teaching approach (part 2). Modern Education, 106, 111-117.
  79. Jimoyiannis, A. (2002). Preparing the school for the information society. Towards an integrated model of integration of information and communication technologies in the Greek educational system. Modern Education, 122, 55-65.
  80. Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2001). Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion. Computers & Education, 36, 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00059-2
  81. Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2003). Investigating Greek students’ ideas about forces and motion. Research in Science Education, 33, 375-392. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025457116654
  82. Johnstone, A. H., MacDonald, J. J., & Webb, G. (1977).Misconceptions in school thermodynamics. Physics Education, 12(4), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/12/4/011
  83. Kalkanis, G., Hadzidaki, P., & Stavrou, D. (2003). An instructional model for a radical conceptual change towards quantum mechanics concepts. Science Education, 87(2), 257-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10033
  84. Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Pre-school teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760120086929
  85. Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004), Anthropomorphism and animism in the early years science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044613.64634.03
  86. Karanikas, G., & Kariotoglou, P. (1996). A comparative study of the perceptions of 4-year PTDE students and 5th and 6th grade elementary school students regarding the concept of liquid buoyancy. Pedagogical Review, 24, 96.
  87. Karanikas, J. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching heat to the fourth-year students of the department of primary education. In D. Psillos (Ed.), European research in science education II (pp. 432-440). Art of Text SA.
  88. Kariotoglou, P., Kounatidis, X., & Karnezou, M. (2004). Bibliographic review of students’ ideas about the concept of power. In Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference on Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education (pp. 429-434).
  89. Kariotogloy, P., Koumaras, P., & Psillos, D. (1993). A constructivist approach for teaching fluid phenomena. Physics Education, 28(3), 164-169. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/28/3/006
  90. Kariotogloy, P., Psillos, D., & Vallassiades, O. (1990). Understanding pressure: Didactical transpositions and pupils’ conceptions. Physics Education, 25, 92-96. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/25/2/003
  91. Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 755-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044080
  92. Keramidas, K., & Psillos, D. (2004). Development of a questionnaire and study of students’ misconceptions in electric circuits. In V. Tselfes, P. Kariotoglou, & M. Patsadakis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference: Teaching of Natural Sciences and Application of New Technologies in Education (pp. 414-421). Christodoulidis Publications.
  93. Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics: An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300107
  94. Kokkotas, P. (1989). Teaching of sciences. Grigoris Publications.
  95. Kokkotas, P., Dracopoulou, M., Vlachos, I., & Plakitsi, K. (1999). How pupils use written language to describe their conceptions of change. In M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education–Past, present, and future (pp. 122-127). IPN Kiel.
  96. Kokkotas, P., Koulaidis, V., Karanikas, Y., Tsatsaroni, A., & Vlachos, Y. (1995). The language of physics: A case study of the concept of force in primary education. In C. Bernardini, C. Tarsitani, & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Thinking physics for teaching (pp. 207-219). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1921-8_15
  97. Koliopoulos, D., & Ravanis, K. (1998). The epistemological dimensions of the problem of didactic transformation. Building a curriculum for teaching energy in the middle school. Physics Review, 26, 36-46.
  98. Kolokotronis, D., & Solomonidou, C. (2003). A step-by-step design and development of an integrated educational software to deal with students’ empirical ideas about mechanical interaction. Education and Information Technologies, 8(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026308009235
  99. Kontogeorgiou, A., Kotsis, K. T., & Mikropoulos, T. (2004). Visual and mental representations for understanding the structure of matter. In Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference on Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education (pp. 58-65).
  100. Kotsis, K. T. (2002). Common characteristics of the perceptions of PTDE students on the forces of weight, friction, fluid buoyancy, and air resistance. Topics in Education, 3(2-3), 201-211.
  101. Kotsis, K. T. (2004). Differences in perceptions of engineering concepts, students of the pedagogy department of elementary education, who were admitted to the university with the last two entrance exam systems. In Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference on Teaching of Sciences and Youth of Technologies in Education (pp. 422-428).
  102. Kotsis, K. T. (2005a). The change of elementary school student’s perceptions of the concept of power due to their teaching with the new school textbooks. In Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference History, Philosophy and Teaching of Sciences (pp. 218-225). Letters Publications.
  103. Kotsis, K. T. (2005b). Physics teaching and experiment. University of Ioannina Publications.
  104. Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2022). Using alternative ideas for determining the learning curve on the concept of force. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12251
  105. Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2023a). Self-concept of Greek primary school teachers and their conceptions of force and weight among their years of service. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(1), ep2301. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12628
  106. Kotsis, K. T., & Panagou, D. (2023b). The determination of the learning curve on the concept of energy using alternative ideas. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(1), ep23011. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/13022
  107. Kotsis, K. T., & Stylos, G. (2023b). Relationship of IQ with alternative ideas of primary school students on the concepts of force and weight. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.544
  108. Kotsis, K. T., Gioti, K., & Athanasiou, E. (2008). Which concepts of Physics are considered difficult to understand by primary education teachers. Research and Practice, 26, 20-27.
  109. Kotsis, K. T., Vemis, K., & Kolovos, X. (2004). The effect of the new textbooks of the science course on the conceptual change of children’s alternative ideas and on the duration of knowledge from their teaching in primary school, in the concept of friction. In Proceedings of the 4th Panhellenic Conference on Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education (pp. 123-129).
  110. Kotsis, K. Τ., & Stylos, G. (2023a). Correlation of primary school students’ misconceptions about concepts of mechanics from their mental age. European Journal of Education Studies, 10(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i1.4619
  111. Kotsis, K. Τ., Stylos, G., Houssou, P., & Kamaratos, M. (2023). Students’ perceptions of the heat and temperature concepts: A comparative study between primary, secondary, and university levels. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.1.577
  112. Koulaidis, B., & Ogborn, J. (1994). Principles of curriculum construction for science teaching: A proposal for ‘completion’. In B. Koulaidis (Ed.), Representations of the physical world. Gutenberg.
  113. Koumaras, P. (1989). Study of the constructive approach in experimental electricity teaching [Doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki].
  114. Koumaras, P., Kariotoglou, P., & Psillos D. (1994). Students’ causal reasoning: The case of engineering. Modern Education, 79, 37.
  115. Koumaras, P., Kariotoglou, P., Antoniadou, N., & Psillos, D. (1992). Constructive strategy in experimental physics teaching. Physics Review, 22, 12-20.
  116. Koumaras, P., Kariotoglou, P., Fasulopoulos, G., & Psillos, D. (1997). Students’ difficulties in understanding density. Pedagogical Review, 25, 161-176.
  117. Koumaras, P., Psillos, D., Valasiadis, O., & Evangelinos, D. (1990). Review of Greek secondary school students’ opinions in the area of electrical circuits. Pedagogical Review, 13, 125-154.
  118. Kruger, C. (1990). Some primary teachers’ ideas about energy. Physics Education, 25, 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/25/2/002
  119. Kruger, C., Palacio, D., & Summers, M. (1992). Surveys of English primary teachers’ conceptions of force, energy, and materials. Science Education, 76(4), 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760402
  120. Lawson, R. A., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). Student understanding of the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems. American Journal of Physics, 55(7), 811-817. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14994
  121. Leighton, J. P., & Bisanz, G. L. (2003). Children’s and adults’ knowledge and models of reasoning about the ozone layer and its depletion. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210163224
  122. Libarkin, J. C., Anderson, S. W., Julie, D. S., Beilfuss, M., & Boone, W. (2005). Qualitative analysis of college students’ ideas about the earth: Interviews and open-ended questionnaires. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.17
  123. Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(7), S12. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1371296
  124. Marinopoulos, D., & Stavridou, H. (2002a). Teaching the materiality of gases and understanding air pollution. A didactic approach in the elementary school. Science Teaching-Research and Practice, 1, 60-67.
  125. Marinopoulos, D., & Stavridou, Η. (2002b). The influence of a collaborative learning environment on primary students conceptions about acid rain. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2002.9655841
  126. Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem-solving. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527890
  127. Mason, L. (2003). Personal epistemologies and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 199-236). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606716
  128. Maurines, L. (1992). Spontaneous reasoning on the propagation of visible mechanical signals. International Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140305
  129. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: Getting students to think in class. AIP Conference Proceedings, 399(1), 981-988. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.53199
  130. McDermott L. C. (1990). Research and computer-based instruction: Opportunity for interaction. American Journal of Physics, 58(5), 452-462. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16487
  131. McDermott L. C., & Redish, E. D. (1999). Resource letter PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(7), 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19122
  132. McMillan III, C., & Swadener, M. (1991). Novice use of qualitative versus quantitative problem-solving in electrostatics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280804
  133. Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers’ and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Teacher Education, 82, 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199804)82:2<197::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-9
  134. Métioui, A., Brassard, C., Levasseur, J., & Lavoie, M. (1996). The persistence of students’ unfounded beliefs about electrical circuits: The case of Ohm’s law. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180205
  135. Migdanalevros, I., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Literacy of students of the department of primary education regarding radioactivity. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 3(3), 136-145.
  136. Migdanalevros, I., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Literacy of students of the physics department regarding the greenhouse effect and the ozone hole. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 3(4), 74-85.
  137. Mikropoulos, T. A. (2002). Simulations and visualizations in the construction of concepts in the natural sciences. In A. Margetousakis, & P. Michaelidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference: Teaching of Natural Sciences and Application of New Technologies in Education (pp. 371-376). ION.
  138. Mikropoulos, T. A., Chalkidis, A., Katsikis, A., & Emvalotis, A. (1998). Students’ attitudes towards educational virtual environments. Education and Information Technologies, 3, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009687025419
  139. Mikropoulos, T. A., Katsikis, A., Nikolou, E., & Tsakalis, P. (2003). Virtual environments in biology teaching. Journal of Biological Education, 37(4), 176-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655879
  140. Mohapatra, J. K., & Bhattacharyya, S. (1989). Pupils, teachers, induced incorrect generalization and the concept of “force”. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 429-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110407
  141. Molochidis, A. (2005). Development of a teaching learning series for the self-education of teachers in phenomena and concepts of fluids [Doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki].
  142. Novak, J. D. (1977). A theory of education. Cornell University Press.
  143. Novak, J. D. (1995). Concept mapping to facilitate teaching and learning. Prospects, 25, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334286
  144. Osborne, R. J. (1983). Towards modifying children’s ideas about electric current. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514830010108
  145. Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1979). Investigating student understanding of basic physics concepts using an interview-about-instances technique. Research in Science Education, 9(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359147
  146. Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980a). A method for investigating concept understanding in science. European Journal of Science Education, 2(3), 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528800020311
  147. Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1980b). A technique for exploring student’s views of the world. Physics Education, 15, 376-379. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/15/6/312
  148. Palmer, D. (1997). The effect of context on students’ reasoning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 681-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190605
  149. Panagou, D., Kotsis, K. T., & Stylos, G. (2021). An empirical study on the evolution of students’ perceptions in basic concepts of physics of primary and secondary education in Cyprus. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(2), 91-109.
  150. Papageorgiou, G., Stamovlasis, D., & Johnson, P. (2009). Particle ideas and interpretations of teachers about changes of state of substances. In P. Kariotoglou, A. Spyrtou, & A. Zoupidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference on Teaching of Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education–The Multiple Approaches to Teaching and Learning Physics Sciences (pp. 640-649).
  151. Pardhan, Η., & Bano, Υ. (2001). Science teachers’ alternate conceptions about direct-currents. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750066538
  152. Petrochilou E., Manesis, E., Rizos I., & Kotsis, K. T. (2007). Evolution of physics students’ perceptions of concepts of Newtonian mechanics during the first two years of their studies. In A. Katsikis, K. T. Kotsis, A. Mikropoulos, & G. Tsaparlis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference Teaching Sciences and New Technologies in Education (pp. 520-527).
  153. Petrochilou, E., Rizos, I., & Kotsis, K. T. (2006). Perceptions of new students of the physics department regarding the concept of force. In Proceedings of the 3rd Panhellenic Conference of the Union for the Teaching of Sciences on the Topic Teaching Sciences and Learning Technologies (pp. 910-913). New Technologies Publications.
  154. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (2000). Bibliography: Students’ alternative frameworks and science. Kiel.
  155. Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of physical causality. Transaction Publishers.
  156. Piaget, J. (1960). The child’s conception of the world. Adams & CO.
  157. Piaget, J. (1970). The child’s conception of movement and speed. Routledge and Keagan Paul.
  158. Pine, K., Messer, D., & Kate, S. J. (2001). Children’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers’ views. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120046240
  159. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
  160. Powell, R. R., & Strudler, N. B. (1993). Preparing teacher leaders and change agents for technology in education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 1(4), 393-408.
  161. Psillos, D. (1999). Teaching fluids: Intended knowledge and students’ actual conceptual evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290813
  162. Psillos, D., Koumaras, P., & Tiberghien, A. (1988). Voltage presented as a primary concept in an introductory teaching sequence on DC circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100104
  163. Ravanis, K. (1988). Changes of state and thermal equilibrium. Modern Education, 39, 83-89.
  164. Redish, E. F. (1994). Implications of cognitive studies for teaching physics. American Journal of Physics, 62(6), 796-803. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17461
  165. Redish, E. F., & Steinberg, R. N. (1999). Teaching physics: Figuring out what works. Physics Today, 52(1), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.882568
  166. Reif, F. (1981). Teaching problem-solving. A scientific approach. Physics Teacher, 19, 310-316. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2340790
  167. Reif, F. (1995). Millikan lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. American Journal of Physics, 63(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17764
  168. Rice, K., & Feher E. (1987). Pinholes and images: Children’s conceptions of light and vision I. Science Education, 71(4), 629-639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710413
  169. Rosenquist, M. L., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). A conceptual approach to teaching kinematics. American Journal of Physics, 55(4), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.15122
  170. Rowell, J. A., Dawson, C. J., & Lyndon, H. (1990). Changing misconceptions: A challenge to science educators. International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069900120205
  171. Rowlands, S., Graham, T., & Berry, J. (1999). Can we speak of alternative frameworks and conceptual change in mechanics? Science and Education, 8(3), 241-271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008631623632
  172. Rudowicz, C., & Sung, H. W. F. (2003). Textbook treatments of the hysteresis loop for ferromagnets–Survey of misconceptions and misinterpretations. American Journal of Physics, 71, 1080-1083. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1583696
  173. Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In Representation and understanding (pp. 211-236). Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6
  174. Rumelhart, D. E. (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. In R. S. Wyer Jr, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 161-188). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  175. Saul, J. M. (1998). Beyond problem-solving: Evaluating introductory physics courses through the hidden curriculum [PhD thesis, University of Maryland].
  176. Schoon, Κ., & Boone, W. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science of pre-service elementary teachers. Science Education, 82(5), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5%3C553::AID-SCE2%3E3.0.CO;2-8
  177. Scott, T., Cole, M., & Engel, M. (1992). Computers and educations: A cultural constructivist perspective. Review of Research in Education, 18, 191-254. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X018001191
  178. Senocak, E., Taskesenligil, Y., & Sozbilir, M. (2007). A study on teaching gases to prospective primary science teachers through problem-based learning. Research in Science Education, 37, 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9026-5
  179. Shipstone, C., van Rhoneck, W., Jung, C., Karrqvist, J., Dupin, J., Joshua, S., & Licht, P. (1988). A study of students’ understanding of electricity in five European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100306
  180. Smith, D. C. (1987). Primary teachers’ misconceptions about light and shadows. In J. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics (pp. 461-476).
  181. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teacher & Teaching Education, 5(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(89)90015-2
  182. Sokoloff, D. R., & Thornton, R. K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. Physics Teacher, 35, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344715
  183. Solomon, J. (1982). How children learn about energy or does the first law come first? The School Science Review, 63(224), 415-422.
  184. Solomonidou, C., & Kolokotronis, D. (2001). Interactions between bodies: Students’ initial ideas and development of appropriate educational software. Themes in Education, 2(2-3), 175-210.
  185. Solomonidou, C., & Stavridou, H. (2001). Design and development of a computer learning environment on the basis on students’ initial conceptions and learning difficulties about chemical equilibrium. Education, and Information Technologies, 6(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011359010331
  186. Solomonidou, X., & Stavridou, H. (1993). The concepts of action and reaction: Study of cognitive difficulties and teaching treatment with an innovative model of research and teaching intervention. Physics Review, 24, 19-33.
  187. Spyrtou A. (2002). Study of a constructive strategy for the training of teachers in sciences [Doctoral dissertation, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki].
  188. Spyrtou, A. (1995). A constructive strategy for the education of future teachers. Modern Education: Quarterly Review of Educational Issues, 84, 50-59.
  189. Spyrtou, A. (1998). Evolution of future teachers’ perceptions of teaching physics. In P. Koumaras, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, & D. Psyllos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Panhellenic Conference: Teaching of Natural Sciences and Application of New Technologies in Education (pp. 571-576). Christodoulidis Publications.
  190. Spyrtou, A., Psillos, D., & Kariotoglou, P. (2003). Investigating the complexity of teachers’ conceptions on science teaching: Issues and tools. In Proceedings of the 6th ESERA Summer School (pp. 85-96).
  191. Stocklmayer, S., & Treagust, D. (1996). Images of electricity: How do novices and experts model electric current? International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180203
  192. Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023a). Greek pre-service primary teachers’ perceptions of and attitudes toward bioenergy. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.015
  193. Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023b). Undergraduate physics students’ understanding of thermal phenomena in everyday life. Contemporary Mathematics and Science Education, 4(2), ep23023. https://doi.org/10.30935/conmaths/1340
  194. Stylos, G., Evaggelakis G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2007). Perceptions of first-year students of seven departments of the University of Ioannina regarding concepts of Newtonian mechanics. In A. Katsikis, K. T. Kotsis, A. Mikropoulos, & C. Tsaparlis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference Teaching Natural Sciences and New Technologies in Education (pp. 528-537).
  195. Stylos, G., Evangelakis, G. A., & Kotsis, K. T. (2008). Misconceptions on classical mechanics by freshman university students: A case study in a physics department in Greece. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 1(2), 157-177.
  196. Stylos, G., Sargioti, A., Mavridis, D., & Kotsis, K. T. (2021). Validation of the thermal concept evaluation test for Greek university students’ misconceptions of thermal concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 43(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1865587
  197. Stylos, G., Siarka, O., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Assessing Greek pre-service primary teachers’ scientific literacy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271-282. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12637
  198. Summers, M. K. (1992). Improving primary school teachers’ understanding of science concepts-theory into practice. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140104
  199. Tao, P. K., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 859-882. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<859::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-J
  200. Thong, W. M., & Gunstone, R. (2008). Some student conceptions of electromagnetic induction. Research in Science Education, 38, 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9038-9
  201. Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58, 858-867. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16350
  202. Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one-dimension. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1020-1028. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12298
  203. Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1981). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of acceleration in one-dimension. American Journal of Physics, 49(13), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.12525
  204. Tselfes, V., & Psillos, D. (1998). Student views on the nature of the scientific and teaching laboratory process. Physics Review, 26, 4-13.
  205. van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  206. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991a). Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research-based instructional strategies. American Journal of Physics, 59(10), 891-897. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16667
  207. Van Heuvelen, A. (1991b). Overview: Case study physics. American Journal of Physics, 59(10), 898-907. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16668
  208. Vavoulioti, A. R., Stylos, G., & Kotsis, K. T. (2023). Acceptance of nuclear energy by preservice teachers in Greece. Aquademia, 7(1), ep23004. https://doi.org/10.30935/aquademia/13205
  209. Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, 1(2), 205-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528790010209
  210. Vosniadou, S. (1991). Designing curricula for conceptual reconstructing: Lessons from the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(3), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027910230302
  211. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
  212. Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213-1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201004
  213. Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gable (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). Macmillan.
  214. Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/18/5/307
  215. Webb, P. (1992). Primary science teachers’ understandings of electric current. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140405
  216. Whitaker, R. J. (1983). Aristotle is not dead: Student understanding of trajectory motion. American Journal of Physics, 51(4), 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.13247
  217. Yalcin, M., Altun, S., Turgut, U., & Aggu, F. (2008). First year Turkish science undergraduates’ understandings and misconceptions of light. Science & Education, 18, 1083-1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9157-3